java - 你如何摆脱对实现接口的多余强制转换?
问题描述
假设我有一个界面
public interface ICardSuit {
/**short name*/
public String getName();
/** the colour of this card*/
public ICardColour getColour();
}
我决定用一个枚举来实现:
public enum CardSuit implements ICardSuit {
HEART{
@Override
public ICardColour getColour() {
return CardColour.RED;
}
},
SPADE{
@Override
public ICardColour getColour() {
return CardColour.BLACK;
}
},
DIAMOND{
@Override
public ICardColour getColour() {
return CardColour.RED;
}
},
CLUBS {
@Override
public ICardColour getColour() {
return CardColour.BLACK;
}
}
;
@Override
public String getName() {
return this.name();
}
}
我现在想测试它(使用 kotlintest,因为我很喜欢它):
class CardSuitTest : FunSpec(){
init {
test("there are exactly four suits"){CardSuit.values().size shouldBe 4}
test("suits implement interface"){CardSuit.values().forEach { it shouldBe instanceOf(ICardSuit::class) }}
test("suits have correct names"){
val suits = CardSuit.values() as Array<out ICardSuit>
suits.forEach { when(it.name){
"HEART" -> it should beTheSameInstanceAs(CardSuit.HEART as ICardSuit)
"SPADE" -> it should beTheSameInstanceAs(CardSuit.SPADE as ICardSuit)
"DIAMOND" -> it should beTheSameInstanceAs(CardSuit.DIAMOND as ICardSuit)
"CLUBS" -> it should beTheSameInstanceAs(CardSuit.CLUBS as ICardSuit)
} }
}
test("suits have correct colours"){
CardSuit.values().forEach { when(it){
CardSuit.HEART,CardSuit.DIAMOND -> it.colour shouldBe CardColour.RED
CardSuit.CLUBS, CardSuit.SPADE -> it.colour shouldBe CardColour.BLACK
} }
}
}
}
我需要转换到的地方,ICardSuit
因为如果我不这样做,编译器会抱怨
None of the following functions can be called with the arguments supplied.
* T.should(Matcher<T>) where T cannot be inferred for infix fun <T> T.should(matcher: Matcher<T>): Unit defined in io.kotlintest.matchers
* ICardSuit.should((ICardSuit) → Unit) where T = ICardSuit for infix fun <T> T.should(matcher: (T) → Unit): Unit defined in io.kotlintest.matchers
我想保留它,as Array<out ICardSuit>
因为这是确保我只访问接口属性的最简单方法,
但我真的不喜欢强制转换我正在测试的实例。
我能做些什么吗?
解决方案
您需要使用 matcher 是否有特定原因beSameInstanceAs
?
您可以执行以下操作:
val suits = CardSuit.values() as Array<out ICardSuite>
suits.forEach {
when (it.name) {
"HEART" -> it shouldBe CardSuit.HEART
"SPADE" -> it shouldBe CardSuit.SPADE
}
}
但是,如果您真的想使用beSameInstanceAs
,您可以:
suits.forEach {
when(it.name) {
"HEART" -> it shouldBeSameInstanceAs CardSuit.HEART
"SPADE" -> it shouldBeSameInstanceAs CardSuit.SPADE
}
}
我在这里并没有真正从编译器那里得到任何抱怨
推荐阅读
- vb6 - VB6 ADODC 控件属性连接字符串,在其他PC上不起作用需要用户路径名
- acumatica - 采购收据下达执行超时
- sql - T SQL查询格式构建动态表
- wpf - Caliburn Micro 键盘快捷键不起作用
- azure-devops - 使用 System.AccessToken 创建服务端点
- php - 在 Laravel 5.7 中限制登录尝试
- sql - R:在 SQL 脚本中使用的日期转换
- ios - UITextView ContentInset
- powerbi - 在 PowerBI 的分组列中获取最大值
- json - Elastic Sink 中的 Kafka Connect 序列化错误