时间戳

首页 > 解决方案 > MongoC++ 驱动程序 BSON 构造：基于流与基于字符串解析。哪个性能更好？

c++ - MongoC++ 驱动程序 BSON 构造：基于流与基于字符串解析。哪个性能更好？

问题描述

MongoDB C++ 驱动程序允许通过两种方式（除其他外）创建 BSON 对象。

基于流：

auto builder = bsoncxx::builder::stream::document{};
bsoncxx::document::value doc_value = builder
  << "name" << "MongoDB"
  << "type" << "database"
  << "count" << 1
  << "versions" << bsoncxx::builder::stream::open_array
    << "v3.2" << "v3.0" << "v2.6"
  << close_array
  << "info" << bsoncxx::builder::stream::open_document
    << "x" << 203
    << "y" << 102
  << bsoncxx::builder::stream::close_document
  << bsoncxx::builder::stream::finalize;

基于解析 JSON 字符串：

std::string doc = "{ "
  "\"name\" : \"MongoDB\","
  "\"type\" : \"database\","
  "\"count\" : 1,"
  "\"versions\": [ \"v3.2\", \"v3.0\", \"v2.6\" ],"
  "\"info\" : {"
    "\"x\" : 203,"
    "\"y\" : 102"
  "}"
"}";
bsoncxx::document::value bsoncxx::from_json(doc);

我想知道从性能的角度来看哪个最方便。我倾向于认为“幕后”流替代方案所涉及的函数调用的数量将比处理 JSON 字符串更糟糕，但它可能是相反的或相等的。

我试图在 MongoDB C++ 驱动程序文档中找到一些关于此的信息，但没有成功。任何信息都非常受欢迎......提前致谢！

标签： c++mongodbmongo-cxx-driver

解决方案

最后我做了一些基准测试。我正在分享我的结果，以防它们对其他人有用。驱动程序版本为 3.4.0。

这是基于流的版本：

#include <iostream>

#include <bsoncxx/builder/stream/document.hpp>
#include <bsoncxx/json.hpp>

#include <mongocxx/client.hpp>
#include <mongocxx/instance.hpp>


int main(int, char**) {
    mongocxx::instance inst{};
    mongocxx::client conn{mongocxx::uri{}};

    for (unsigned int ix = 0; ix < 10000000 ; ++ix) {
       auto builder = bsoncxx::builder::stream::document{};
       bsoncxx::document::value doc_value = builder
      << "name" << "MongoDB"
      << "type" << "database"
      << "count" << 1
      << "versions" << bsoncxx::builder::stream::open_array
        << "v3.2" << "v3.0" << "v2.6"
      << bsoncxx::builder::stream::close_array
      << "info" << bsoncxx::builder::stream::open_document
        << "x" << 203
        << "y" << 102
      << bsoncxx::builder::stream::close_document
          << bsoncxx::builder::stream::finalize;
    }
}

这是基于文本解析的版本：

#include <iostream>

#include <bsoncxx/builder/stream/document.hpp>
#include <bsoncxx/json.hpp>

#include <mongocxx/client.hpp>
#include <mongocxx/instance.hpp>


int main(int, char**) {
    mongocxx::instance inst{};
    mongocxx::client conn{mongocxx::uri{}};

    for (unsigned int ix = 0; ix < 10000000 ; ++ix) {
        std::string doc = "{ "
      "\"name\" : \"MongoDB\","
      "\"type\" : \"database\","
      "\"count\" : 1,"
      "\"versions\": [ \"v3.2\", \"v3.0\", \"v2.6\" ],"
      "\"info\" : {"
        "\"x\" : 203,"
        "\"y\" : 102"
      "}"
    "}";
       bsoncxx::document::value doc_value = bsoncxx::from_json(doc);
    }
}

如您所见，程序的结构和迭代次数（10,000,000）在两种情况下都是相同的。

编译使用：

c++ --std=c++11 test-stream.cpp -o test-stream $(pkg-config --cflags --libs libmongocxx)
c++ --std=c++11 test-textparsing.cpp -o test-textparsing $(pkg-config --cflags --libs libmongocxx)

测试流的结果（三次）：

$ time ./test-stream ; time ./test-stream ; time ./test-stream 

real    0m16,454s
user    0m16,200s
sys 0m0,084s

real    0m17,034s
user    0m16,900s
sys 0m0,012s

real    0m18,812s
user    0m18,708s
sys 0m0,036s

使用 test-textparsing 的结果（也是 3 次）：

$ time ./test-textparsing ; time ./test-textparsing ; time ./test-textparsing 

real    0m53,678s
user    0m53,576s
sys 0m0,024s

real    1m0,203s
user    0m59,788s
sys 0m0,116s

real    0m57,259s
user    0m56,824s
sys 0m0,200s

结论：基于流的策略大大优于基于文本的策略。

对实验进行同行检查可以很好地确认结果；）

编辑：我添加了一个基于基本构建器的测试用例：

#include <iostream>

#include <bsoncxx/builder/stream/document.hpp>
#include <bsoncxx/json.hpp>

#include <mongocxx/client.hpp>
#include <mongocxx/instance.hpp>

using bsoncxx::builder::basic::kvp;

int main(int, char**) {
    mongocxx::instance inst{};
    mongocxx::client conn{mongocxx::uri{}};

    for (unsigned int ix = 0; ix < 10000000 ; ++ix) {
       bsoncxx::builder::basic::document basic_builder{};
       basic_builder.append(kvp("name", "MongoDB"));
       basic_builder.append(kvp("type", "database"));
       basic_builder.append(kvp("count", 1));

       bsoncxx::builder::basic::array array_builder{};
       array_builder.append("v3.2");
       array_builder.append("v3.0");
       array_builder.append("v2.6");
       basic_builder.append(kvp("versions", array_builder.extract()));  

       bsoncxx::builder::basic::document object_builder{};
       object_builder.append(kvp("x", 203));
       object_builder.append(kvp("y", 102));
       basic_builder.append(kvp("info", object_builder.extract()));  

       bsoncxx::document::value doc_value = basic_builder.extract();
    }
}

这样编译：

c++ --std=c++11 test-basic.cpp -o test-basic $(pkg-config --cflags --libs libmongocxx)

我用这些结果再次运行了测试：

basic
-----

real    0m20,725s
user    0m20,656s
sys 0m0,004s

real    0m20,651s
user    0m20,620s
sys 0m0,008s

real    0m20,102s
user    0m20,088s
sys 0m0,000s

stream
------

real    0m11,841s
user    0m11,780s
sys 0m0,024s

real    0m11,967s
user    0m11,932s
sys 0m0,008s

real    0m11,634s
user    0m11,616s
sys 0m0,008s

textparsing
-----------

real    0m37,209s
user    0m37,184s
sys 0m0,004s

real    0m36,336s
user    0m36,208s
sys 0m0,028s

real    0m35,840s
user    0m35,648s
sys 0m0,048s

结论：

  • 金牌：基于流的方法
  • 银牌：基本构建方法（与基于流的方法相比，倍增 81.8%）
  • 铜牌：文本解析方法（与基于流的相比，倍增 227.7%）

在开始实验之前，我打赌基本构建会获胜，但最终它是基于流的。也许我的test-basic.cpp代码有问题？还是结果有意义？

推荐阅读