python - 如何选择策略来减少过拟合？

Question

我正在使用 keras 在预先训练的网络上应用迁移学习。我有带有二进制类标签的图像补丁，并想使用 CNN 来预测 [0; 1] 用于看不见的图像补丁。

• 网络：使用 imageNet 预训练的 ResNet50，我在其中添加了 3 层
• 数据：70305 个训练样本，8000 个验证样本，66823 个测试样本，所有类别标签的数量均平衡
• 图像：3 波段 (RGB) 和 224x224 像素

• 设置：32 个批次，转换大小。层数：16

• 结果：在几个 epoch 之后，我的准确率已经接近 1，损失接近 0，而在验证数据上，准确率保持在 0.5，并且每个 epoch 的损失都不同。最后，CNN 只为所有未见过的补丁预测一个类别。

• 问题：似乎我的网络过度拟合。

以下策略可以减少过拟合：

• 增加批量大小
• 减小全连接层的大小
• 添加退出层
• 添加数据增强
• 通过修改损失函数应用正则化
• 解冻更多预训练层
• 使用不同的网络架构

我尝试了高达 512 的批量大小，并更改了全连接层的大小，但没有取得多大成功。在随机测试其余部分之前，我想问一下如何调查出现问题的原因，以便找出上述策略中哪个最有潜力。

在我的代码下面：

def generate_data(imagePathTraining, imagesize, nBatches):
    datagen = ImageDataGenerator(rescale=1./255)
    generator = datagen.flow_from_directory\
        (directory=imagePathTraining,                           # path to the target directory
         target_size=(imagesize,imagesize),                     # dimensions to which all images found will be resize
         color_mode='rgb',                                      # whether the images will be converted to have 1, 3, or 4 channels
         classes=None,                                          # optional list of class subdirectories
         class_mode='categorical',                              # type of label arrays that are returned
         batch_size=nBatches,                                   # size of the batches of data
         shuffle=True)                                          # whether to shuffle the data
    return generator

def create_model(imagesize, nBands, nClasses):
    print("%s: Creating the model..." % datetime.now().strftime('%Y-%m-%d_%H-%M-%S'))
    # Create pre-trained base model
    basemodel = ResNet50(include_top=False,                     # exclude final pooling and fully connected layer in the original model
                         weights='imagenet',                    # pre-training on ImageNet
                         input_tensor=None,                     # optional tensor to use as image input for the model
                         input_shape=(imagesize,                # shape tuple
                                      imagesize,
                                      nBands),
                         pooling=None,                          # output of the model will be the 4D tensor output of the last convolutional layer
                         classes=nClasses)                      # number of classes to classify images into
    print("%s: Base model created with %i layers and %i parameters." %
          (datetime.now().strftime('%Y-%m-%d_%H-%M-%S'),
           len(basemodel.layers),
           basemodel.count_params()))

    # Create new untrained layers
    x = basemodel.output
    x = GlobalAveragePooling2D()(x)                             # global spatial average pooling layer
    x = Dense(16, activation='relu')(x)                         # fully-connected layer
    y = Dense(nClasses, activation='softmax')(x)                # logistic layer making sure that probabilities sum up to 1

    # Create model combining pre-trained base model and new untrained layers
    model = Model(inputs=basemodel.input,
                  outputs=y)
    print("%s: New model created with %i layers and %i parameters." %
          (datetime.now().strftime('%Y-%m-%d_%H-%M-%S'),
           len(model.layers),
           model.count_params()))

    # Freeze weights on pre-trained layers
    for layer in basemodel.layers:
        layer.trainable = False

    # Define learning optimizer
    optimizerSGD = optimizers.SGD(lr=0.01,                      # learning rate.
                                  momentum=0.0,                 # parameter that accelerates SGD in the relevant direction and dampens oscillations
                                  decay=0.0,                    # learning rate decay over each update
                                  nesterov=False)               # whether to apply Nesterov momentum

    # Compile model
    model.compile(optimizer=optimizerSGD,                       # stochastic gradient descent optimizer
                  loss='categorical_crossentropy',              # objective function
                  metrics=['accuracy'],                         # metrics to be evaluated by the model during training and testing
                  loss_weights=None,                            # scalar coefficients to weight the loss contributions of different model outputs
                  sample_weight_mode=None,                      # sample-wise weights
                  weighted_metrics=None,                        # metrics to be evaluated and weighted by sample_weight or class_weight during training and testing
                  target_tensors=None)                          # tensor model's target, which will be fed with the target data during training
    print("%s: Model compiled." % datetime.now().strftime('%Y-%m-%d_%H-%M-%S'))
    return model

def train_model(model, nBatches, nEpochs, imagePathTraining, imagesize, nSamples, valX,valY, resultPath):
    history = model.fit_generator(generator=generate_data(imagePathTraining, imagesize, nBatches),
                                  steps_per_epoch=nSamples//nBatches,     # total number of steps (batches of samples)
                                  epochs=nEpochs,               # number of epochs to train the model
                                  verbose=2,                    # verbosity mode. 0 = silent, 1 = progress bar, 2 = one line per epoch
                                  callbacks=None,               # keras.callbacks.Callback instances to apply during training
                                  validation_data=(valX,valY),  # generator or tuple on which to evaluate the loss and any model metrics at the end of each epoch
                                  class_weight=None,            # optional dictionary mapping class indices (integers) to a weight (float) value, used for weighting the loss function
                                  max_queue_size=10,            # maximum size for the generator queue
                                  workers=32,                   # maximum number of processes to spin up when using process-based threading
                                  use_multiprocessing=True,     # whether to use process-based threading
                                  shuffle=True,                 # whether to shuffle the order of the batches at the beginning of each epoch
                                  initial_epoch=0)              # epoch at which to start training
    print("%s: Model trained." % datetime.now().strftime('%Y-%m-%d_%H-%M-%S')) 
    return history

标签： pythontensorflowmachine-learningkerasdeep-learning

Answer 1

这些结果似乎太糟糕了，不能成为过度拟合的情况。相反，我怀疑用于训练和验证的数据存在差异。

我注意到对于您正在使用的训练数据ImageDataGenerator(rescale=1./255)，但是对于valX我没有看到任何此类处理。我建议对验证数据使用具有相同重新缩放配置的单独 ImageDataGenerator。这样差异尽可能小。