首页 > 解决方案 > Parallel asynchronous iteraor - is it possible?

问题描述

Right now I have the following code:

import axios from 'axios'

const urls = ['https://google.com', 'https://yahoo.com']

async function* requests() {
  for (const url of urls) {
    yield axios.get(url)
  }
}

;(async () => {
  for await (const n of requests()) {
    console.log(n.config.url) // prints https://google.com and then https://yahoo.com
  }
})()

As is, the requests won't block the single thread of node, but they will happen in sequence. I'm wondering if it would be possible to change the code to force parallelism.

标签: javascriptnode.jsasync-awaitasync-iterator

解决方案


“更简单”的 no-deps 方法是对它们进行批处理并使用Promise.all

import axios from 'axios'

const urls = [
  'https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/todos/1', 
  'https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1',
  'https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/users/1',
  'https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/comments/1'
]

async function* requests(batchSize = 1) {
  let batchedRequests = [];
  for (const url of urls) {
    batchedRequests.push(axios.get(url));
    if (batchedRequests.length === batchSize) {
      yield Promise.all(batchedRequests);
      batchedRequests = [];
    }
  }
  if (batchedRequests.length) { //if there are requests left in batch
    yield Promise.all(batchedRequests);
  }
}

;(async () => {
  for await (const batch of requests(2)) {
    batch.forEach(n => console.log(n.config.url)) // prints https://google.com and then https://yahoo.com
  }
})()

您可以使用rxjsobservables 在灵活性方面获得类似的结果,但它是另一个库,如果您不熟悉反应流,它可能会更复杂。这是我在该主题上找到的详细帖子:https ://medium.com/@ravishivt/batch-processing-with-rxjs-6408b0761f39


推荐阅读