首页 > 解决方案 > 对重叠时间间隔中的数据求和

问题描述

我正在尝试为一组以领先/滞后方式运行的过滤器创建汇总统计信息。

关于领先/滞后的简短描述:

当一个新的过滤器上线时,它被置于滞后位置,这意味着水在通过初级(又名铅)过滤器后通过它。当前置过滤器堵塞时,当前的滞后过滤器移动到前置位置。总而言之,过滤器从滞后位置开始,然后撞到领先位置。

在视觉上,你可以想象它是这样的:

滤波器图

我需要做的是总结单个过滤器在线的整个时间,无论是领先还是落后。

这是示例数据:

structure(list(record_timestamp = structure(c(1608192000, 1608192060,1608192120, 1608192180, 1608192240, 1608192300, 1608192360, 1608192420,1608192480, 1608192540, 1608192600, 1608192660, 1608192720, 1608192780,1608192840, 1608192900, 1608192960, 1608193020, 1608193080, 1608193140,1608193200, 1608193260, 1608193320, 1608193380, 1608193440, 1608193500,1608193560, 1608193620, 1608193680, 1608193740, 1608193800), class = c("POSIXct","POSIXt"), tzone = "UTC"), flow = c(20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 15, 15, 15, 15, 15, 15, 15, 15, 15, 15, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10), lag_start = structure(c(1608192000,1608192000, 1608192000, 1608192000, 1608192000, 1608192000, 1608192000,1608192000, 1608192000, 1608192000, 1608192000, 1608192660, 1608192660,1608192660, 1608192660, 1608192660, 1608192660, 1608192660, 1608192660,1608192660, 1608192660, 1608193260, 1608193260, 1608193260, 1608193260,1608193260, 1608193260, 1608193260, 1608193260, 1608193260, 1608193260), class = c("POSIXct", "POSIXt"), tzone = "UTC"), lead_start = c("#N/A","#N/A", "#N/A", "#N/A", "#N/A", "#N/A", "#N/A", "#N/A", "#N/A","#N/A", "#N/A", "12/17/2020 8:11", "12/17/2020 8:11", "12/17/2020 8:11","12/17/2020 8:11", "12/17/2020 8:11", "12/17/2020 8:11", "12/17/2020 8:11","12/17/2020 8:11", "12/17/2020 8:11", "12/17/2020 8:11", "12/17/2020 8:21","12/17/2020 8:21", "12/17/2020 8:21", "12/17/2020 8:21", "12/17/2020 8:21","12/17/2020 8:21", "12/17/2020 8:21", "12/17/2020 8:21", "12/17/2020 8:21","12/17/2020 8:21")), class = c("spec_tbl_df", "tbl_df", "tbl","data.frame"), row.names = c(NA, -31L), spec = structure(list(cols = list(record_timestamp = structure(list(), class = c("collector_character","collector")), flow = structure(list(), class = c("collector_double","collector")), polish_start = structure(list(), class = c("collector_character", "collector")), lead_start = structure(list(), class = c("collector_character","collector"))), default = structure(list(), class = c("collector_guess","collector")), skip = 1), class = "col_spec"))

我的想法是“取消嵌套”它们并接受会有重复的时间戳,但每一行只会与一个过滤器相关联。关于如何做到这一点的任何想法?未嵌套的 DF 看起来像:

structure(list(record_timestamp = structure(c(1608192000, 1608192060,1608192120, 1608192180, 1608192240, 1608192300, 1608192360, 1608192420,1608192480, 1608192540, 1608192600, 1608192660, 1608192720, 1608192780,1608192840, 1608192900, 1608192960, 1608193020, 1608193080, 1608193140,1608193200, 1608192660, 1608192720, 1608192780, 1608192840, 1608192900,1608192960, 1608193020, 1608193080, 1608193140, 1608193200, 1608193260,1608193320, 1608193380, 1608193440, 1608193500, 1608193560,1608193620,1608193680, 1608193740, 1608193800), class = c("POSIXct", "POSIXt"), tzone = "UTC"), flow = c(20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 15, 15, 15, 15, 15, 15, 15, 15, 15, 15, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA), lag_start = structure(c(1608192000, 1608192000, 1608192000,1608192000, 1608192000, 1608192000, 1608192000, 1608192000,1608192000,1608192000, 1608192000, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, 1608192660, 1608192660, 1608192660, 1608192660, 1608192660, 1608192660,1608192660, 1608192660, 1608192660, 1608192660, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA), class = c("POSIXct", "POSIXt"), tzone = "UTC"), lead_start = structure(c(NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA,NA, NA, NA, 1608192660, 1608192660, 1608192660, 1608192660,1608192660, 1608192660, 1608192660, 1608192660, 1608192660,1608192660, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, NA, 1608193260,1608193260, 1608193260, 1608193260, 1608193260, 1608193260,1608193260, 1608193260, 1608193260, 1608193260), class = c("POSIXct","POSIXt"), tzone = "UTC"), filter_id = c(1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2)), class = c("spec_tbl_df", 
"tbl_df", "tbl", "data.frame"), row.names = c(NA, -41L), spec = structure(list(cols = list(record_timestamp = structure(list(), class = c("collector_character","collector")), flow = structure(list(), class = c("collector_double","collector")), polish_start = structure(list(), class = c("collector_character","collector")), lead_start = structure(list(), class = c("collector_character", "collector")), filter_id = structure(list(), class = c("collector_double","collector"))), default = structure(list(), class = c("collector_guess","collector")), skip = 1), class = "col_spec"))

然而,我意识到,这将使我正在使用的数据的大小增加一倍,这已经是几年的一分钟数据了。因此,如果有一种方法可以在不加倍时间戳的情况下做到这一点,那将是首选。

最后,最终目标是有一个小的摘要 DF,如下所示:

   Filter ID  |  Total Flow
----------------------------
       1      |     370
       2      |     250
      ...     |     ...

标签: rdplyrlubridate

解决方案


感谢您提供更多信息。看来你可以独处group_by的时间。lag_start然后,您可以计算flow处于该位置时的总数(领先或落后)。之后,您可以按顺序分配过滤器编号,然后总过滤器flow将是flow当前行和下一行的总和。这是否给出了预期的结果?

df %>%
  group_by(lag_start) %>%
  summarise(flow_per_position = sum(flow)) %>%
  mutate(filter_id = row_number(),
         total_filter_flow = flow_per_position + lead(flow_per_position, default = 0))

输出

  lag_start           flow_per_position filter_id total_filter_flow
  <dttm>                          <dbl>     <int>             <dbl>
1 2020-12-17 08:00:00               220         1               370
2 2020-12-17 08:11:00               150         2               250
3 2020-12-17 08:21:00               100         3               100

推荐阅读